On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:13:23 -0500 Timur Tabi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote: > > > That is still Linux internal artifacts leaking out. Don't encode that > > data into the device tree. > > The I2C bus number is *not* an internal artifact. On Freescale parts, the one > I2C adapter is specifically designated I2C1, and the 2nd one is specifically > designated I2C2. This is part of the silicon, and so the device tree should > specify it. And it does. It does so by the unique "regs" properties and unit-names. You can assign the index that the i2c subsystem needs based on probe order, like I already said. I don't know why Jean doesn't like that. It's not a made up number. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
