On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:10:01PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > This helper is only used with the dispatch trace log collection. > A later patch will add Form2 affinity support and this change helps > in keeping that simpler. Also add a comment explaining we don't expect > the code to be called with FORM0 > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index 64caaf07cf82..696e5bfe1414 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void unmap_cpu_from_node(unsigned long cpu)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR */
>
> -int cpu_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
> +static int __cpu_form1_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
> {
> int dist = 0;
>
> @@ -182,6 +182,14 @@ int cpu_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
> return dist;
> }
>
> +int cpu_distance(__be32 *cpu1_assoc, __be32 *cpu2_assoc)
> +{
> + /* We should not get called with FORM0 */
> + VM_WARN_ON(affinity_form == FORM0_AFFINITY);
> +
> + return __cpu_form1_distance(cpu1_assoc, cpu2_assoc);
> +}
> +
> /* must hold reference to node during call */
> static const __be32 *of_get_associativity(struct device_node *dev)
> {
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
