Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: > This series is a cleanup of the use of 'struct ppc_inst'. > > A confusion is made between internal representation of powerpc > instructions with 'struct ppc_inst' and in-memory code which is > and will always be an array of 'unsigned int'.
Why don't we use u32 *, to make it even more explicit what the expected size is? cheers
