On 7/22/21 8:06 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 11:59:15AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 08:41:12PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
No functional change in this patch.

The new name does not match how you describe "primary domain index" in
the documentation from patch 6/6.  There it comes from the values in
associativity-reference-points, but here it simply comes from the
lengths of all the associativity properties.

No, sorry, I misread this code... misled by the old name, so it's a
good thing you're changing it.

But.. I'm still not sure the new name is accurate, either...

[snip]
        if (form1_affinity) {
-               depth = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1);
+               index = of_read_number(distance_ref_points, 1);

AFACIT distance_ref_points hasn't been altered from the
of_get_property() at this point, so isn't this setting depth / index
to the number of entries in ref-points, rather than the value of the
first entry (which is what primary domain index is supposed to be).


ibm,associativity-reference-points property format is as below.

# lsprop  ibm,associativity-reference-points
ibm,associativity-reference-points
                 00000004 00000002

it doesn't have the number of elements as the first item.

For FORM1 1 element is the NUMA boundary index/primary_domain_index
For FORM0 2 element is the NUMA boundary index/primary_domain_index.


        } else {
                if (distance_ref_points_depth < 2) {
                        printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA: "
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void)
                        goto err;
                }
- depth = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1);
+               index = of_read_number(&distance_ref_points[1], 1);
        }
/*
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int __init find_min_common_depth(void)
        }
of_node_put(root);
-       return depth;
+       return index;
err:
        of_node_put(root);
@@ -437,16 +437,16 @@ int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
        int nid = default_nid;
        int rc, index;
- if ((min_common_depth < 0) || !numa_enabled)
+       if ((primary_domain_index < 0) || !numa_enabled)
                return default_nid;
rc = of_get_assoc_arrays(&aa);
        if (rc)
                return default_nid;
- if (min_common_depth <= aa.array_sz &&
+       if (primary_domain_index <= aa.array_sz &&
            !(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_AI_INVALID) && lmb->aa_index < 
aa.n_arrays) {
-               index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + min_common_depth - 1;
+               index = lmb->aa_index * aa.array_sz + primary_domain_index - 1;
                nid = of_read_number(&aa.arrays[index], 1);
if (nid == 0xffff || nid >= nr_node_ids)
@@ -708,18 +708,18 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
                return -1;
        }
- min_common_depth = find_min_common_depth();
+       primary_domain_index = find_primary_domain_index();
- if (min_common_depth < 0) {
+       if (primary_domain_index < 0) {
                /*
-                * if we fail to parse min_common_depth from device tree
+                * if we fail to parse primary_domain_index from device tree
                 * mark the numa disabled, boot with numa disabled.
                 */
                numa_enabled = false;
-               return min_common_depth;
+               return primary_domain_index;
        }
- dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", min_common_depth);
+       dbg("NUMA associativity depth for CPU/Memory: %d\n", 
primary_domain_index);
/*
         * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
@@ -919,14 +919,14 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void)
                        goto out;
        }
- max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[min_common_depth], 1);
+       max_nodes = of_read_number(&domains[primary_domain_index], 1);
        for (i = 0; i < max_nodes; i++) {
                if (!node_possible(i))
                        node_set(i, node_possible_map);
        }
prop_length /= sizeof(int);
-       if (prop_length > min_common_depth + 2)
+       if (prop_length > primary_domain_index + 2)
                coregroup_enabled = 1;
out:
@@ -1259,7 +1259,7 @@ int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
                goto out;
index = of_read_number(associativity, 1);
-       if (index > min_common_depth + 1)
+       if (index > primary_domain_index + 1)
                return of_read_number(&associativity[index - 1], 1);
out:





Reply via email to