On Sat Sep 11, 2021 at 4:14 AM CDT, Jordan Niethe wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Christopher M. Riedl
> <c...@bluescreens.de> wrote:
> >
> > When code patching a STRICT_KERNEL_RWX kernel the page containing the
> > address to be patched is temporarily mapped as writeable. Currently, a
> > per-cpu vmalloc patch area is used for this purpose. While the patch
> > area is per-cpu, the temporary page mapping is inserted into the kernel
> > page tables for the duration of patching. The mapping is exposed to CPUs
> > other than the patching CPU - this is undesirable from a hardening
> > perspective. Use a temporary mm instead which keeps the mapping local to
> > the CPU doing the patching.
> >
> > Use the `poking_init` init hook to prepare a temporary mm and patching
> > address. Initialize the temporary mm by copying the init mm. Choose a
> > randomized patching address inside the temporary mm userspace address
> > space. The patching address is randomized between PAGE_SIZE and
> > DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW-PAGE_SIZE.
> >
> > Bits of entropy with 64K page size on BOOK3S_64:
> >
> > bits of entropy = log2(DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW_USER64 / PAGE_SIZE)
> >
> > PAGE_SIZE=64K, DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW_USER64=128TB
> > bits of entropy = log2(128TB / 64K)
> > bits of entropy = 31
> >
> > The upper limit is DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW due to how the Book3s64 Hash MMU
> > operates - by default the space above DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW is not
> > available. Currently the Hash MMU does not use a temporary mm so
> > technically this upper limit isn't necessary; however, a larger
> > randomization range does not further "harden" this overall approach and
> > future work may introduce patching with a temporary mm on Hash as well.
> >
> > Randomization occurs only once during initialization at boot for each
> > possible CPU in the system.
> >
> > Introduce two new functions, map_patch_mm() and unmap_patch_mm(), to
> > respectively create and remove the temporary mapping with write
> > permissions at patching_addr. Map the page with PAGE_KERNEL to set
> > EAA[0] for the PTE which ignores the AMR (so no need to unlock/lock
> > KUAP) according to PowerISA v3.0b Figure 35 on Radix.
> >
> > Based on x86 implementation:
> >
> > commit 4fc19708b165
> > ("x86/alternatives: Initialize temporary mm for patching")
> >
> > and:
> >
> > commit b3fd8e83ada0
> > ("x86/alternatives: Use temporary mm for text poking")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher M. Riedl <c...@bluescreens.de>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > v6: * Small clean-ups (naming, formatting, style, etc).
> > * Call stop_using_temporary_mm() before pte_unmap_unlock() after
> > patching.
> > * Replace BUG_ON()s in poking_init() w/ WARN_ON()s.
> >
> > v5: * Only support Book3s64 Radix MMU for now.
> > * Use a per-cpu datastructure to hold the patching_addr and
> > patching_mm to avoid the need for a synchronization lock/mutex.
> >
> > v4: * In the previous series this was two separate patches: one to init
> > the temporary mm in poking_init() (unused in powerpc at the time)
> > and the other to use it for patching (which removed all the
> > per-cpu vmalloc code). Now that we use poking_init() in the
> > existing per-cpu vmalloc approach, that separation doesn't work
> > as nicely anymore so I just merged the two patches into one.
> > * Preload the SLB entry and hash the page for the patching_addr
> > when using Hash on book3s64 to avoid taking an SLB and Hash fault
> > during patching. The previous implementation was a hack which
> > changed current->mm to allow the SLB and Hash fault handlers to
> > work with the temporary mm since both of those code-paths always
> > assume mm == current->mm.
> > * Also (hmm - seeing a trend here) with the book3s64 Hash MMU we
> > have to manage the mm->context.active_cpus counter and mm cpumask
> > since they determine (via mm_is_thread_local()) if the TLB flush
> > in pte_clear() is local or not - it should always be local when
> > we're using the temporary mm. On book3s64's Radix MMU we can
> > just call local_flush_tlb_mm().
> > * Use HPTE_USE_KERNEL_KEY on Hash to avoid costly lock/unlock of
> > KUAP.
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> > index e802e42c2789..af8e2a02a9dd 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > +#include <linux/random.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> > #include <asm/page.h>
> > @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ static inline void stop_using_temporary_mm(struct
> > temp_mm *temp_mm)
> >
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vm_struct *, text_poke_area);
> > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_patching_addr);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mm_struct *, cpu_patching_mm);
> >
> > static int text_area_cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
> > {
> > @@ -126,8 +128,48 @@ static int text_area_cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static __always_inline void __poking_init_temp_mm(void)
> > +{
> > + int cpu;
> > + spinlock_t *ptl; /* for protecting pte table */
>
> ptl is just used so we don't have to open code allocating a pte in
> patching_mm isn't it?
Yup - I think that comment was a copy-pasta... I'll improve it.
>
> > + pte_t *ptep;
> > + struct mm_struct *patching_mm;
> > + unsigned long patching_addr;
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > + patching_mm = copy_init_mm();
> > + WARN_ON(!patching_mm);
>
> Would it be okay to just let the mmu handle null pointer dereferences?
In general I think yes; however, the NULL dereference wouldn't occur
until later during actual patching so I thought an early WARN here is
appropriate.
>
> > + per_cpu(cpu_patching_mm, cpu) = patching_mm;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Choose a randomized, page-aligned address from the range:
> > + * [PAGE_SIZE, DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW - PAGE_SIZE] The lower
> > + * address bound is PAGE_SIZE to avoid the zero-page. The
> > + * upper address bound is DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW - PAGE_SIZE to
> > + * stay under DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW with the Book3s64 Hash MMU.
> > + */
> > + patching_addr = PAGE_SIZE + ((get_random_long() & PAGE_MASK)
> > + % (DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW - 2 * PAGE_SIZE));
> > + per_cpu(cpu_patching_addr, cpu) = patching_addr;
>
> On x86 the randomization depends on CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE. Should it
> be controllable here too?
IIRC CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE is for KASLR which IMO doesn't really have
much to do with this.
>
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * PTE allocation uses GFP_KERNEL which means we need to
> > + * pre-allocate the PTE here because we cannot do the
> > + * allocation during patching when IRQs are disabled.
> > + */
> > + ptep = get_locked_pte(patching_mm, patching_addr, &ptl);
> > + WARN_ON(!ptep);
> > + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > void __init poking_init(void)
> > {
> > + if (radix_enabled()) {
> > + __poking_init_temp_mm();
>
> Should this also be done with cpuhp_setup_state()?
I think I prefer doing the setup ahead of time during boot.
>
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > WARN_ON(cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> > "powerpc/text_poke:online", text_area_cpu_up,
> > text_area_cpu_down) < 0);
> > @@ -197,30 +239,93 @@ static inline int unmap_patch_area(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +struct patch_mapping {
> > + spinlock_t *ptl; /* for protecting pte table */
> > + pte_t *ptep;
> > + struct temp_mm temp_mm;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This can be called for kernel text or a module.
> > + */
> > +static int map_patch_mm(const void *addr, struct patch_mapping
> > *patch_mapping)
> > +{
> > + struct page *page;
> > + struct mm_struct *patching_mm = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_mm);
> > + unsigned long patching_addr = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_addr);
> > +
> > + if (is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(addr))
> > + page = vmalloc_to_page(addr);
> > + else
> > + page = virt_to_page(addr);
> > +
> > + patch_mapping->ptep = get_locked_pte(patching_mm, patching_addr,
> > + &patch_mapping->ptl);
> > + if (unlikely(!patch_mapping->ptep)) {
> > + pr_warn("map patch: failed to allocate pte for patching\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + set_pte_at(patching_mm, patching_addr, patch_mapping->ptep,
> > + pte_mkdirty(mk_pte(page, PAGE_KERNEL)));
> > +
> > + init_temp_mm(&patch_mapping->temp_mm, patching_mm);
> > + start_using_temporary_mm(&patch_mapping->temp_mm);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int unmap_patch_mm(struct patch_mapping *patch_mapping)
> > +{
> > + struct mm_struct *patching_mm = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_mm);
> > + unsigned long patching_addr = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_addr);
> > +
> > + pte_clear(patching_mm, patching_addr, patch_mapping->ptep);
> > +
> > + local_flush_tlb_mm(patching_mm);
> > + stop_using_temporary_mm(&patch_mapping->temp_mm);
> > +
> > + pte_unmap_unlock(patch_mapping->ptep, patch_mapping->ptl);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, struct ppc_inst instr)
> > {
> > int err, rc = 0;
> > u32 *patch_addr = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + struct patch_mapping patch_mapping;
> >
> > /*
> > - * During early early boot patch_instruction is called
> > - * when text_poke_area is not ready, but we still need
> > - * to allow patching. We just do the plain old patching
> > + * During early early boot patch_instruction is called when the
> > + * patching_mm/text_poke_area is not ready, but we still need to
> > allow
> > + * patching. We just do the plain old patching.
> > */
> > - if (!this_cpu_read(text_poke_area))
> > - return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
> > + if (radix_enabled()) {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_mm))
> > + return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
> > + } else {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(text_poke_area))
> > + return raw_patch_instruction(addr, instr);
> > + }
>
> Would testing cpu_patching_addr handler both of these cases?
>
> Then I think it might be clearer to do something like this:
> if (radix_enabled()) {
> return patch_instruction_mm(addr, instr);
> }
>
> patch_instruction_mm() would combine map_patch_mm(), then patching and
> unmap_patch_mm() into one function.
>
> IMO, a bit of code duplication would be cleaner than checking multiple
> times for radix_enabled() and having struct patch_mapping especially
> for maintaining state.
Hmm, I think it's a good idea - I'll give it a go for the next version.
Thanks for the suggestion!
>
> >
> > local_irq_save(flags);
> >
> > - err = map_patch_area(addr);
> > + if (radix_enabled())
> > + err = map_patch_mm(addr, &patch_mapping);
> > + else
> > + err = map_patch_area(addr);
> > if (err)
> > goto out;
> >
> > patch_addr = (u32 *)(__this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_addr) |
> > offset_in_page(addr));
> > rc = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr);
> >
> > - err = unmap_patch_area();
> > + if (radix_enabled())
> > + err = unmap_patch_mm(&patch_mapping);
> > + else
> > + err = unmap_patch_area();
> >
> > out:
> > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
> Thanks,
> Jordan
