BPF load instruction with BPF_PROBE_MEM mode can cause a fault
inside kernel. Append exception table for such instructions
within BPF program.
Unlike other archs which uses extable 'fixup' field to pass dest_reg
and nip, BPF exception table on PowerPC follows the generic PowerPC
exception table design, where it populates both fixup and extable
sections within BPF program. fixup section contains 3 instructions,
first 2 instructions clear dest_reg (lower & higher 32-bit registers)
and last instruction jumps to next instruction in the BPF code.
extable 'insn' field contains relative offset of the instruction and
'fixup' field contains relative offset of the fixup entry. Example
layout of BPF program with extable present:
+------------------+
| |
| |
0x4020 -->| lwz r28,4(r4) |
| |
| |
0x40ac -->| lwz r3,0(r24) |
| lwz r4,4(r24) |
| |
| |
|------------------|
0x4278 -->| li r28,0 | \
| li r27,0 | | fixup entry
| b 0x4024 | /
0x4284 -->| li r4,0 |
| li r3,0 |
| b 0x40b4 |
|------------------|
0x4290 -->| insn=0xfffffd90 | \ extable entry
| fixup=0xffffffe4 | /
0x4298 -->| insn=0xfffffe14 |
| fixup=0xffffffe8 |
+------------------+
(Addresses shown here are chosen random, not real)
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbath...@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v3:
* Changed how BPF_FIXUP_LEN is defined based on Chris' suggestion.
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 561689a2abdf..800734056200 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -144,7 +144,11 @@ struct codegen_context {
unsigned int exentry_idx;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
+#define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 3 /* Three instructions => 12 bytes */
+#else
#define BPF_FIXUP_LEN 2 /* Two instructions => 8 bytes */
+#endif
static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
{
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index f02457c6b54f..1a0041997050 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -297,6 +297,8 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
int pass, struct code
(ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4);
fixup[0] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0);
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32))
+ fixup[1] = PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg - 1, 0); /* clear higher 32-bit
register too */
fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1] =
PPC_RAW_BRANCH((long)(pc + jmp_off) -
(long)&fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 820c7848434e..1239643f532c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -812,11 +812,19 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
struct codegen_context *
*/
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* dst = *(u8 *)(ul) (src +
off) */
fallthrough;
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B:
+ fallthrough;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* dst = *(u16 *)(ul) (src +
off) */
fallthrough;
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H:
+ fallthrough;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* dst = *(u32 *)(ul) (src +
off) */
fallthrough;
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
+ fallthrough;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src +
off) */
+ fallthrough;
+ case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
switch (size) {
case BPF_B:
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off));
@@ -841,6 +849,32 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
struct codegen_context *
if (size != BPF_DW && !fp->aux->verifier_zext)
EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg_h, 0));
+
+ if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
+ int insn_idx = ctx->idx - 1;
+ int jmp_off = 4;
+
+ /*
+ * In case of BPF_DW, two lwz instructions are
emitted, one
+ * for higher 32-bit and another for lower
32-bit. So, set
+ * ex->insn to the first of the two and jump
over both
+ * instructions in fixup.
+ *
+ * Similarly, with !verifier_zext, two
instructions are
+ * emitted for BPF_B/H/W case. So, set ex->insn
to the
+ * instruction that could fault and skip over
both
+ * instructions.
+ */
+ if (size == BPF_DW || !fp->aux->verifier_zext) {
+ insn_idx -= 1;
+ jmp_off += 4;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, pass,
ctx, insn_idx,
+ jmp_off, dst_reg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
break;
/*
--
2.31.1
