Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> writes: > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> > --- > > Notes: > This could be considered a sequel to: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/[email protected]/ > > which tried to address both the suboptimal delay behavior as well as > naming > issues. The present change achieves the performance improvement and leaves > the matter of naming for another time. > > I've incorporated Alexey's feedback from that series to avoid division > when > calculating the arguments to usleep_range().
Oops, this part is redundant with information in the cover. Git should discard it if/when applied, though.
