Em Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:47:47PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
> Add new macros for mem_hops field which can be used to
> represent remote-node, socket and board level details.
> 
> Currently the code had macro for HOPS_0 which, corresponds
> to data coming from another core but same node.
> Add new macros for HOPS_1 to HOPS_3 to represent
> remote-node, socket and board level data.
> 
> Also add corresponding strings in the mem_hops array to
> represent mem_hop field data in perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf function
> 
> Incase mem_hops field is used, PERF_MEM_LVLNUM field also need
> to be set inorder to represent the data source. Hence printing
> data source via PERF_MEM_LVL field can be skip in that scenario.
> 
> For ex: Encodings for mem_hops fields with L2 cache:

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> L2                      - local L2
> L2 | REMOTE | HOPS_0    - remote core, same node L2
> L2 | REMOTE | HOPS_1    - remote node, same socket L2
> L2 | REMOTE | HOPS_2    - remote socket, same board L2
> L2 | REMOTE | HOPS_3    - remote board L2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kj...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h |  5 ++++-
>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.c          | 29 +++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h 
> b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index bd8860eeb291..4cd39aaccbe7 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1332,7 +1332,10 @@ union perf_mem_data_src {
>  
>  /* hop level */
>  #define PERF_MEM_HOPS_0              0x01 /* remote core, same node */
> -/* 2-7 available */
> +#define PERF_MEM_HOPS_1         0x02 /* remote node, same socket */
> +#define PERF_MEM_HOPS_2         0x03 /* remote socket, same board */
> +#define PERF_MEM_HOPS_3         0x04 /* remote board */
> +/* 5-7 available */
>  #define PERF_MEM_HOPS_SHIFT  43
>  
>  #define PERF_MEM_S(a, s) \
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> index 3167b4628b6d..ed0ab838bcc5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ static const char * const mem_hops[] = {
>        * to be set with mem_hops field.
>        */
>       "core, same node",
> +     "node, same socket",
> +     "socket, same board",
> +     "board",
>  };
>  
>  int perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, struct mem_info *mem_info)
> @@ -316,7 +319,7 @@ int perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, struct 
> mem_info *mem_info)
>       size_t i, l = 0;
>       u64 m =  PERF_MEM_LVL_NA;
>       u64 hit, miss;
> -     int printed;
> +     int printed = 0;
>  
>       if (mem_info)
>               m  = mem_info->data_src.mem_lvl;
> @@ -335,18 +338,22 @@ int perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, 
> struct mem_info *mem_info)
>               l += 7;
>       }
>  
> -     if (mem_info && mem_info->data_src.mem_hops)
> +     /*
> +      * Incase mem_hops field is set, we can skip printing data source via
> +      * PERF_MEM_LVL namespace.
> +      */
> +     if (mem_info && mem_info->data_src.mem_hops) {
>               l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, "%s ", 
> mem_hops[mem_info->data_src.mem_hops]);
> -
> -     printed = 0;
> -     for (i = 0; m && i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_lvl); i++, m >>= 1) {
> -             if (!(m & 0x1))
> -                     continue;
> -             if (printed++) {
> -                     strcat(out, " or ");
> -                     l += 4;
> +     } else {
> +             for (i = 0; m && i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_lvl); i++, m >>= 1) {
> +                     if (!(m & 0x1))
> +                             continue;
> +                     if (printed++) {
> +                             strcat(out, " or ");
> +                             l += 4;
> +                     }
> +                     l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, mem_lvl[i]);
>               }
> -             l += scnprintf(out + l, sz - l, mem_lvl[i]);
>       }
>  
>       if (mem_info && mem_info->data_src.mem_lvl_num) {
> -- 
> 2.27.0

-- 

- Arnaldo

Reply via email to