PPC_BL_ABS() is just doing a relative branch with link. The name
suggests that it is for branching to an absolute address, which is
incorrect. Rename the macro to a more appropriate PPC_BL().

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h        | 6 +++---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 5cb3efd76715a9..0832235a274983 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@
                EMIT(PPC_RAW_BRANCH(offset));                                 \
        } while (0)
 
-/* blr; (unconditional 'branch' with link) to absolute address */
-#define PPC_BL_ABS(dest)       EMIT(PPC_INST_BL |                            \
-                                    (((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + 
ctx->idx)) & 0x03fffffc))
+/* bl (unconditional 'branch' with link) */
+#define PPC_BL(dest)   EMIT(PPC_INST_BL | (((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + 
ctx->idx)) & 0x03fffffc))
+
 /* "cond" here covers BO:BI fields. */
 #define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest)                                            \
        do {                                                                  \
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c 
b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 014cf893ce90d6..cf66b25ed7c865 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct 
codegen_context *ctx, u64 func
        s32 rel = (s32)func - (s32)(image + ctx->idx);
 
        if (image && rel < 0x2000000 && rel >= -0x2000000) {
-               PPC_BL_ABS(func);
+               PPC_BL(func);
                EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
                EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
                EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to