Because get_immrbase in fsl_soc.c does not work without it.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:42 PM, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:46PM -0600, John Rigby wrote: >> Updated device tree for MPC5121ADS > > [snip] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] { >> compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-immr"; >> + device_type = "soc"; > > I realise we still need the unwanted device_type value on the soc in > some cases for backwards compatibility, but why are you adding it > where it wasn't before..? > > -- > David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code > david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ > | _way_ _around_! > http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-dev mailing list > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev