On 4/13/22 11:24, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> A workaround makes fbdev hot-unplugging work for framebuffers without
> device. The only user for this feature was offb. As each OF framebuffer
> now has an associated platform device, the workaround is no longer
> needed. Remove it. Effectively reverts commit 0f525289ff0d ("fbdev: Fix
> unregistering of framebuffers without device").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c 
> b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> index bc6ed750e915..bdd00d381bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> @@ -1579,14 +1579,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct 
> apertures_struct *a,
>                        * If it's not a platform device, at least print a 
> warning. A
>                        * fix would add code to remove the device from the 
> system.
>                        */
> -                     if (!device) {
> -                             /* TODO: Represent each OF framebuffer as its 
> own
> -                              * device in the device hierarchy. For now, offb
> -                              * doesn't have such a device, so unregister the
> -                              * framebuffer as before without warning.
> -                              */
> -                             do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);

Maybe we could still keep this for a couple of releases but with a big
warning that's not supported in case there are out-of-tree drivers out
there that still do this ?

Or at least a warning if the do_unregister_framebuffer() call is removed.

Regardless of what you chose to do, the patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat

Reply via email to