On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, May 13 2022 at 14:19, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> The argument about not bloating the code > >> with an "obvious???" function which is quite small is slightly beyond my > >> comprehension level. > > > > That obvious function would look like this: > > > > void hpet_set_comparator_one_shot(int channel, u32 delta) > > { > > u32 count; > > > > count = hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER); > > count += delta; > > hpet_writel(count, HPET_Tn_CMP(channel)); > > } > > This function only works reliably when the delta is large. See > hpet_clkevt_set_next_event().
That is a good point. One more reason to not have a hpet_set_comparator_one_shot(), IMO. Thanks and BR, Ricardo