Hello Thomas, On 5/18/22 20:30, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > There will be more DRM drivers for firmware-provided framebuffers. Use > the existing entry for simpledrm instead of adding a new one for each > driver. Also add DRM's aperture helpers, which are part of the driver's > infrastructure. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de> > ---
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com> I think you could push this without waiting for 2/2 to be ready. > MAINTAINERS | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 5c1fd93d9050..43d833273ae9 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -6388,13 +6388,15 @@ S: Orphan / Obsolete > F: drivers/gpu/drm/savage/ > F: include/uapi/drm/savage_drm.h > > -DRM DRIVER FOR SIMPLE FRAMEBUFFERS > +DRM DRIVER FOR FIRMWARE FRAMEBUFFERS > M: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmerm...@suse.de> > M: Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com> > L: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > S: Maintained > T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc > +F: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c > F: drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/simpledrm.c > +F: include/drm/drm_aperture.h I wonder if we could add drivers/firmware/sysfb* as well, it certainly is related since is the place where different platforms register the device. But it's not in drivers/gpu, hence the question if we could include it (and possibly merge it through drm-misc as well, etc). Dave, Daniel, what do you think ? -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat
