Change 'subsquent' to 'subsequent'.
Change 'accross' to 'across'.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Jiaming <[email protected]>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
index 4ca23644f752..b4b680f2d853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static int xive_vm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned 
long xirr)
        if (irq == XICS_IPI || irq == 0) {
                /*
                 * This barrier orders the setting of xc->cppr vs.
-                * subsquent test of xc->mfrr done inside
+                * subsequent test of xc->mfrr done inside
                 * scan_interrupts and push_pending_to_hw
                 */
                smp_mb();
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static int xive_vm_h_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned 
long xirr)
        /*
         * This barrier orders both setting of in_eoi above vs,
         * subsequent test of guest_priority, and the setting
-        * of xc->cppr vs. subsquent test of xc->mfrr done inside
+        * of xc->cppr vs. subsequent test of xc->mfrr done inside
         * scan_interrupts and push_pending_to_hw
         */
        smp_mb();
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int xive_set_source(struct kvmppc_xive *xive, long 
irq, u64 addr)
        /*
         * Now, we select a target if we have one. If we don't we
         * leave the interrupt untargetted. It means that an interrupt
-        * can become "untargetted" accross migration if it was masked
+        * can become "untargetted" across migration if it was masked
         * by set_xive() but there is little we can do about it.
         */
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to