On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hi All! > > At long last, a respin of the cpuidle vs rcu cleanup patches. > > v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220608142723.103523...@infradead.org > > These here patches clean up the mess that is cpuidle vs rcuidle. > > At the end of the ride there's only on RCU_NONIDLE user left: > > arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c: RCU_NONIDLE(__cpu_suspend_exit()); > > and 'one' trace_*_rcuidle() user: > > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_irq_enable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1); > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_irq_disable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, CALLER_ADDR1); > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_irq_enable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, caller_addr); > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_irq_disable_rcuidle(CALLER_ADDR0, caller_addr); > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_preempt_enable_rcuidle(a0, a1); > kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c: > trace_preempt_disable_rcuidle(a0, a1); > > However this last is all in deprecated code that should be unused for > GENERIC_ENTRY. > > I've touched a lot of code that I can't test and I might've broken something > by > accident. In particular the whole ARM cpuidle stuff was quite involved. > > Please all; have a look where you haven't already. > > > New since v1: > > - rebase on top of Frederic's rcu-context-tracking rename fest > - more omap goodness as per the last discusion (thanks Tony!) > - removed one more RCU_NONIDLE() from arm64/risc-v perf code > - ubsan/kasan fixes > - intel_idle module-param for testing > - a bunch of extra __always_inline, because compilers are silly.
Except for those I have already tagged as Reviewed: Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org> Thanks for the hard work!
