On Wed Sep 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM AEST, Rohan McLure wrote:
> Change system_call_exception arguments to pass a pointer to a stack frame
> container caller state, as well as the original r0, which determines the
> number of the syscall. This has been observed to yield improved performance
> to passing them by registers, circumventing the need to allocate a stack
> frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohan McLure <rmcl...@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks for splitting it out, I think it does make it nicer to review.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> index 15af0ed019a7..0e9ba3efee94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,7 @@
>
>
> /* Has to run notrace because it is entered not completely "reconciled" */
> -notrace long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4, long r5,
> - long r6, long r7, long r8,
> - unsigned long r0, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long r0)
> {
> long ret;
> syscall_fn f;
> @@ -136,12 +134,6 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(long r3, long r4,
> long r5,
> r0 = do_syscall_trace_enter(regs);
> if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls))
> return regs->gpr[3];
> - r3 = regs->gpr[3];
> - r4 = regs->gpr[4];
> - r5 = regs->gpr[5];
> - r6 = regs->gpr[6];
> - r7 = regs->gpr[7];
> - r8 = regs->gpr[8];
>
> } else if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
> if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
> --
> 2.34.1
This is probably just missing the hunk
+ ret = f(regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4], regs->gpr[5],
+ regs->gpr[6], regs->gpr[7], regs->gpr[8]);
which got into your next patch.
Otherwise I think it looks good.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
