On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:17:20AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > Hi mm and ppc list, > > Recently I started to hit a kernel panic [2] rarely on *ppc64le* with *1k > blocksize* ext4. It's not easy to reproduce, but still has chance to trigger > by loop running generic/048 on ppc64le (not sure all kind of ppc64le can > reproduce it). > > Although I've reported a bug to ext4 [1] (more details refer to [1]), but I > only > hit it on ppc64le until now, and I'm not sure if it's an ext4 related bug, > more > likes folio related issue, so I cc mm and ppc mail list, hope to get more > reviewing.
Argh. This is the wrong way to do it. Please stop using bugzilla. Now there's discussion in two places and there's nowhere to see all of it. > [ 4681.230907] BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0x00000069 > [ 4681.230922] Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000068ee0c > [ 4681.230929] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] > [ 4681.230934] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries > [ 4681.230991] CPU: 0 PID: 82 Comm: kswapd0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted > 6.0.0-rc6+ #1 > [ 4681.230999] NIP: c00000000068ee0c LR: c00000000068f2b8 CTR: > 0000000000000000 > [ 4681.238525] REGS: c000000006c0b560 TRAP: 0380 Not tainted (6.0.0-rc6+) > [ 4681.238532] MSR: 800000000280b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: > 24028242 XER: 00000000 > [ 4681.238556] CFAR: c00000000068edf4 IRQMASK: 0 > [ 4681.238556] GPR00: c00000000068f2b8 c000000006c0b800 c000000002cf1700 > c00c00000042f1c0 > [ 4681.238556] GPR04: c000000006c0b860 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 > 0000000000000000 > [ 4681.238556] GPR08: c000000002d404b0 0000000000000000 c00c00000042f1c0 > 0000000000000000 > [ 4681.238556] GPR12: c0000000001cf080 c000000005100000 c000000000194298 > c0000001fff9c480 > [ 4681.238556] GPR16: c000000048cdb850 0000000000000007 0000000000000000 > 0000000000000000 > [ 4681.238556] GPR20: 0000000000000001 c000000006c0b8f8 c00000000146b9d8 > 5deadbeef0000100 > [ 4681.238556] GPR24: 5deadbeef0000122 c000000048cdb800 c000000006c0bc00 > c000000006c0b8e8 > [ 4681.238556] GPR28: c000000006c0b860 c00c00000042f1c0 0000000000000009 > 0000000000000009 > [ 4681.238634] NIP [c00000000068ee0c] drop_buffers.constprop.0+0x4c/0x1c0 > [ 4681.238643] LR [c00000000068f2b8] try_to_free_buffers+0x128/0x150 > [ 4681.238650] Call Trace: > [ 4681.238654] [c000000006c0b800] [c000000006c0b880] 0xc000000006c0b880 > (unreliable) > [ 4681.238663] [c000000006c0b840] [c000000006c0bc00] 0xc000000006c0bc00 > [ 4681.238670] [c000000006c0b890] [c000000000498708] > filemap_release_folio+0x88/0xb0 > [ 4681.238679] [c000000006c0b8b0] [c0000000004c51c0] > shrink_active_list+0x490/0x750 > [ 4681.238688] [c000000006c0b9b0] [c0000000004c9f88] > shrink_lruvec+0x3f8/0x430 > [ 4681.238697] [c000000006c0baa0] [c0000000004ca1f4] > shrink_node_memcgs+0x234/0x290 > [ 4681.238704] [c000000006c0bb10] [c0000000004ca3c4] shrink_node+0x174/0x6b0 > [ 4681.238711] [c000000006c0bbc0] [c0000000004cacf0] > balance_pgdat+0x3f0/0x970 > [ 4681.238718] [c000000006c0bd20] [c0000000004cb440] kswapd+0x1d0/0x450 > [ 4681.238726] [c000000006c0bdc0] [c0000000001943d8] kthread+0x148/0x150 > [ 4681.238735] [c000000006c0be10] [c00000000000cbe4] > ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64 > [ 4681.238745] Instruction dump: > [ 4681.238749] fbc1fff0 f821ffc1 7c7d1b78 7c9c2378 ebc30028 7fdff378 48000018 > 60000000 > [ 4681.238765] 60000000 ebff0008 7c3ef840 41820048 <815f0060> e93f0000 > 5529077c 7d295378 Running that through scripts/decodecode (with some minor hacks .. how do PPC people do this properly?) I get: 0: fb c1 ff f0 std r30,-16(r1) 4: f8 21 ff c1 stdu r1,-64(r1) 8: 7c 7d 1b 78 mr r29,r3 c: 7c 9c 23 78 mr r28,r4 10: eb c3 00 28 ld r30,40(r3) 14: 7f df f3 78 mr r31,r30 18: 48 00 00 18 b 0x30 1c: 60 00 00 00 nop 20: 60 00 00 00 nop 24: eb ff 00 08 ld r31,8(r31) 28: 7c 3e f8 40 cmpld r30,r31 2c: 41 82 00 48 beq 0x74 30:* 81 5f 00 60 lwz r10,96(r31) <-- trapping instruction 34: e9 3f 00 00 ld r9,0(r31) 38: 55 29 07 7c rlwinm r9,r9,0,29,30 3c: 7d 29 53 78 or r9,r9,r10 That would seem to track; 96 is 0x60 and r31 contains 0x00..09, giving us an effective address of 0x69. It would be nice to know what source line that corresponds to. Could you use scripts/faddr2line to turn drop_buffers.constprop.0+0x4c/0x1c0 into a line number? I can't because it needs the vmlinux you generated.
