On Wed, Nov 16 2022 at 10:12, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> What a zoo:
>> 
>>      PCI_MSI
>>      select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
>> 
>>      PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>>              def_bool y
>>      depends on PCI_MSI
>>      select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>> 
>> Ergo PCI_MSI enables PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN which in turn selects
>> GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN. So all the dependencies on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN are
>> just an indirection to PCI_MSI.
>> 
>> Match the reality and just admit that PCI_MSI requires
>> GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
>
> Just FYI, this will conflict with my work-in-progress to add more
> COMPILE_TEST coverage:
>   
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?id=72b5e7c401a1
>
> No *actual* conflicts, just textually next door, so should be sipmle
> to resolve.  Worst case I can postpone my patch until the next cycle.

Linus should be able to resolve that conflict :)

Reply via email to