On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:39:25PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> What about just copying x86's implementation including using
> __builtin_frame_address(1/2)? Are those builtins reliable for all
> our targets and compiler versions?
__builtin_frame_address(n) with n > 0 is specifically not supported, not
on any architecture; it does not work in all situations on *any* arch,
and not in *any* situation on some archs.
This is clearly documented:
Calling this function with a nonzero argument can have
unpredictable effects, including crashing the calling program. As
a result, calls that are considered unsafe are diagnosed when the
'-Wframe-address' option is in effect. Such calls should only be
made in debugging situations.
(and that warning is enabled by -Wall).
Segher
