On 1/31/23 7:20 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:

"bpf" tests fails in environment with missing libtraceevent
support as below:

  # ./perf test 36
  36: BPF filter                                                      :
  36.1: Basic BPF filtering                                           : FAILED!
  36.2: BPF pinning                                                   : FAILED!
  36.3: BPF prologue generation                                       : FAILED!

The environment has clang but missing the libtraceevent
devel. Hence perf is compiled without libtraceevent support.

Detailed logs:
        ./perf test -v "Basic BPF filtering"

        Failed to add BPF event syscalls:sys_enter_epoll_pwait
        bpf: tracepoint call back failed, stop iterate
        Failed to add events selected by BPF

The bpf tests tris to add probe event which fails
at "parse_events_add_tracepoint" function due to missing
libtraceevent. Add check for "HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" in the
"tests/bpf.c" before proceeding with the test.

With the change,

        # ./perf test 36
        36: BPF filter                                                      :
        36.1: Basic BPF filtering                                           : 
Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
        36.2: BPF pinning                                                   : 
Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
        36.3: BPF prologue generation                                       : 
Skip (not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)

Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Tested the patch on powerpc, perf bpf test skips when libtraceevent-devel 
package is not installed.

 36: BPF filter                                                      :
 36.1: Basic BPF filtering                                           : Skip 
(not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
 36.2: BPF pinning                                                   : Skip 
(not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)
 36.3: BPF prologue generation                                       : Skip 
(not compiled in or missing libtraceevent support)

Tested-by: Disha Goel<disg...@linux.ibm.com>

---
  tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 17c023823713..4af39528f611 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
  #define NR_ITERS       111
  #define PERF_TEST_BPF_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/perf_test"
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
  #include <linux/bpf.h>
  #include <bpf/bpf.h>
@@ -330,10 +330,10 @@ static int test__bpf(int i)
  static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
                                int subtest __maybe_unused)
  {
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
        return test__bpf(0);
  #else
-       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not 
compiled\n");
        return TEST_SKIP;
  #endif
  }
@@ -341,10 +341,10 @@ static int test__basic_bpf_test(struct test_suite *test 
__maybe_unused,
  static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
                             int subtest __maybe_unused)
  {
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
        return test__bpf(1);
  #else
-       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not 
compiled\n");
        return TEST_SKIP;
  #endif
  }
@@ -352,17 +352,17 @@ static int test__bpf_pinning(struct test_suite *test 
__maybe_unused,
  static int test__bpf_prologue_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
                                   int subtest __maybe_unused)
  {
-#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE)
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE) && 
defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
        return test__bpf(2);
  #else
-       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF support is not compiled\n");
+       pr_debug("Skip BPF test because BPF or libtraceevent support is not 
compiled\n");
        return TEST_SKIP;
  #endif
  }
static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
-#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT)
        TEST_CASE("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test),
        TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning,
                        "clang isn't installed or environment missing BPF 
support"),
@@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ static struct test_case bpf_tests[] = {
        TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled 
in"),
  #endif
  #else
-       TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled 
in"),
-       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in"),
-       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled 
in"),
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("Basic BPF filtering", basic_bpf_test, "not compiled in or 
missing libtraceevent support"),
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF pinning", bpf_pinning, "not compiled in or missing 
libtraceevent support"),
+       TEST_CASE_REASON("BPF prologue generation", bpf_prologue_test, "not compiled 
in or missing libtraceevent support"),
  #endif
        { .name = NULL, }
  };

Reply via email to