On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:09:13AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
+       } else if (proc_gen == proc_gen_p10) {
+               int val;
+               char al[8], xl[8], otl[8], phb[8];

Are four different variables needed here? I think you could just reuse one temporary variable.

                char name[8];

+               for (i=0; i<8; i++) {
+                       val = ((avl_vec & (0x7ULL << (29 + (3 * i)))) >> (29 + 
(3 * i)));
+                       switch (val) {
+                       case 0x5: //xlink configured and functional
+
+                               snprintf(al, sizeof(al), "alink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, al);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl, sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_0",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl,sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_1",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               break;
+                       case 0x6: //alink configured and functional
+
+                               snprintf(xl,sizeof(xl),"xlink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, xl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl,sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_0",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl,sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_1",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+                               break;
+
+                       case 0x7: //CAPI configured and functional
+                               snprintf(al,sizeof(al),"alink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, al);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(xl,sizeof(xl),"xlink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, xl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+                               break;
+                       default:
+                               snprintf(xl,sizeof(xl),"xlink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, xl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(al,sizeof(al),"alink%1d",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, al);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl,sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_0",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+
+                               snprintf(otl,sizeof(otl),"otl%1d_1",(7-i));
+                               target = dt_find_by_name_substr(dev, otl);
+                               if (target)
+                                       dt_free(target);
+                               break;

As far as I know skiboot follows the kernel coding style. Would you mind fixing up the minor style nits checkpatch.pl reports for this patch?

--
Reza Arbab

Reply via email to