Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:19:32 -0500
> Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> [snip]
>> A new aux vector entry, AT_BASE_PLATFORM, will denote the actual hardware.
[snip]
> OK.
>
> But it conflicts directly with the already-queued
> execve-filename-document-and-export-via-auxiliary-vector.patch
[snip]
It seems to me that most of the patch conflicts are mechanical
and could be merged mechanically.
However I believe that the documentation change to this comment is important:
-----
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> -#define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE (14 + 2) /* NEW_AUX_ENT entries in auxiliary
> table */
> +#define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE 17 /* NEW_AUX_ENT entries in auxiliary table */
> + /* number of "#define AT_.*" above, minus {AT_NULL, AT_IGNORE, AT_NOTELF}
> */
> #endif
-----
I scratched my head for a while to figure out that AT_NOTELF also was
a subtraction as far as AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE was concerned.
--
John Reiser, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
