Hello Randy,
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 05:33:28PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE is not set but PPC_UDBG_16550=y,
> the legacy_serial code references fsl8250_handle_irq, which is
> only built when SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE is set.
>
> Be consistent in referencing the used CONFIG_SERIAL_8250*
> symbols so that the build errors do not happen.
>
> Prevents these build errors:
>
> powerpc-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.o: in function
> `serial_dev_init':
> legacy_serial.c:(.init.text+0x2aa): undefined reference to
> `fsl8250_handle_irq'
> powerpc-linux-ld: legacy_serial.c:(.init.text+0x2b2): undefined reference to
> `fsl8250_handle_irq'
>
> Fixes: 66eff0ef528b ("powerpc/legacy_serial: Warn about 8250 devices operated
> without active FSL workarounds")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c
> @@ -508,9 +508,9 @@ static void __init fixup_port_irq(int in
>
> port->irq = virq;
>
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250) &&
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE) &&
> of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550")) {
> - if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250)) {
> + if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE)) {
> port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq;
> port->has_sysrq =
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE);
> } else {Argh, indeed there is a problem. Your patch however defeats the idea of 66eff0ef528b[1] which is still valid. And with your patch the else branch that starts at the end of the above hunk is never taken. With the feedback I got on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20230605130857.85543-3-u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de the probable outcome is that CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL becomes tristate and so the fix that is more future proof and keeps the warning, looks as follows: diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c index fdbd85aafeb1..6ee65741dbd5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void __init fixup_port_irq(int index, if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250) && of_device_is_compatible(np, "fsl,ns16550")) { - if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250)) { + if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL)) { port->handle_irq = fsl8250_handle_irq; port->has_sysrq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE); } else { This should to the right thing now (while CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL is still bool and only on if CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 is =y) and also once CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_FSL can be =m (which would make fsl8250_handle_irq not available for powerpc platform code). But given that I screwed this up several times now, I will think about this some more and do some more tests before submitting that as a proper patch. Best regards Uwe [1] Warn if the 8250 device is used but the required FSL workarounds are not. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
