On Thu, May 25 2023 at 01:56, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
> enum cpuhp_smt_control cpu_smt_control __read_mostly = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
> +static unsigned int cpu_smt_max_threads __ro_after_init;
> +unsigned int cpu_smt_num_threads;
Why needs this to be global? cpu_smt_control is pointlessly global already.
> void __init cpu_smt_disable(bool force)
> {
> @@ -433,10 +435,18 @@ void __init cpu_smt_disable(bool force)
> * The decision whether SMT is supported can only be done after the full
> * CPU identification. Called from architecture code.
> */
> -void __init cpu_smt_check_topology(void)
> +void __init cpu_smt_check_topology(unsigned int num_threads)
> {
> if (!topology_smt_supported())
> cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> +
> + cpu_smt_max_threads = num_threads;
> +
> + // May already be disabled by nosmt command line parameter
> + if (cpu_smt_control != CPU_SMT_ENABLED)
> + cpu_smt_num_threads = 1;
> + else
> + cpu_smt_num_threads = num_threads;
Taking Laurents findings into account this should be something like
the incomplete below.
x86 would simply invoke cpu_smt_set_num_threads() with both arguments as
smp_num_siblings while PPC can funnel its command line parameter through
the num_threads argument.
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -414,6 +414,8 @@ void __weak arch_smt_update(void) { }
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
enum cpuhp_smt_control cpu_smt_control __read_mostly = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
+static unsigned int cpu_smt_max_threads __ro_after_init;
+static unsigned int cpu_smt_num_threads = UINT_MAX;
void __init cpu_smt_disable(bool force)
{
@@ -427,24 +429,31 @@ void __init cpu_smt_disable(bool force)
pr_info("SMT: disabled\n");
cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_DISABLED;
}
+ cpu_smt_num_threads = 1;
}
/*
* The decision whether SMT is supported can only be done after the full
* CPU identification. Called from architecture code.
*/
-void __init cpu_smt_check_topology(void)
+void __init cpu_smt_set_num_threads(unsigned int max_threads, unsigned int
num_threads)
{
- if (!topology_smt_supported())
+ if (max_threads == 1)
cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
-}
-static int __init smt_cmdline_disable(char *str)
-{
- cpu_smt_disable(str && !strcmp(str, "force"));
- return 0;
+ cpu_smt_max_threads = max_threads;
+
+ /*
+ * If SMT has been disabled via the kernel command line or SMT is
+ * not supported, set cpu_smt_num_threads to 1 for consistency.
+ * If enabled, take the architecture requested number of threads
+ * to bring up into account.
+ */
+ if (cpu_smt_control != CPU_SMT_ENABLED)
+ cpu_smt_num_threads = 1;
+ else if (num_threads < cpu_smt_num_threads)
+ cpu_smt_num_threads = num_threads;
}
-early_param("nosmt", smt_cmdline_disable);
static inline bool cpu_smt_allowed(unsigned int cpu)
{
@@ -463,6 +472,13 @@ static inline bool cpu_smt_allowed(unsig
return !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &cpus_booted_once_mask);
}
+static int __init smt_cmdline_disable(char *str)
+{
+ cpu_smt_disable(str && !strcmp(str, "force"));
+ return 0;
+}
+early_param("nosmt", smt_cmdline_disable);
+
/* Returns true if SMT is not supported of forcefully (irreversibly) disabled
*/
bool cpu_smt_possible(void)
{
