Le 22/06/2023 à 13:48, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:54:32PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> On powerpc, switch tables are relative, than means the address of the
>> table is added to the value of the entry in order to get the pointed
>> address: (r10 is the table address, r4 the index in the table)
>>
>>        lis     r10,0         <== Load r10 with upper part of .rodata address
>>            R_PPC_ADDR16_HA     .rodata
>>        addi    r10,r10,0             <== Add lower part of .rodata address
>>            R_PPC_ADDR16_LO     .rodata
>>        lwzx    r8,r10,r4             <== Read table entry at r10 + r4 into r8
>>        add     r10,r8,r10    <== Add table address to read value
>>        mtctr   r10           <== Save calculated address in CTR
>>        bctr                  <== Branch to address in CTR
>>
>> But for c_jump_tables it is not the case, they contain the
>> pointed address directly:
>>
>>        lis     r28,0         <== Load r28 with upper .rodata..c_jump_table
>>            R_PPC_ADDR16_HA   .rodata..c_jump_table
>>        addi    r28,r28,0             <== Add lower part of 
>> .rodata..c_jump_table
>>            R_PPC_ADDR16_LO   .rodata..c_jump_table
>>        lwzx    r10,r28,r10   <== Read table entry at r10 + r28 into r10
>>        mtctr   r10           <== Save read value in CTR
>>        bctr                  <== Branch to address in CTR
>>
>> Add support to objtool for relative tables, with a flag in order to
>> tell table by table if that table uses relative or absolute addressing.
>>
>> And use correct size for 'long' instead of hard coding a size of '8'.
> 
> Again, see tip/objtool/core...
> 
> This one is going to be a little hard. It would be very good if you can
> avoid growing struct reloc; Josh went through a ton of effort to shrink
> it.
> 
> Would it work to use reloc->sym->is_rel_jumptable ? That still has a few
> spare bits in it's bitfield.
> 

I noticed that the relocation types are different, so the flag is indeed 
not needed. I have now done the following, will it work for x86 ?

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index ae4a1608d97e..05d789e6d3b6 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ static int add_jump_table(struct objtool_file 
*file, struct instruction *insn,
        struct symbol *pfunc = insn_func(insn)->pfunc;
        struct reloc *table = insn_jump_table(insn);
        struct instruction *dest_insn;
-       unsigned int prev_offset = 0;
+       unsigned int offset, prev_offset = 0;
        struct reloc *reloc = table;
        struct alternative *alt;

@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ static int add_jump_table(struct objtool_file 
*file, struct instruction *insn,
                        break;

                /* Make sure the table entries are consecutive: */
-               if (prev_offset && reloc_offset(reloc) != prev_offset + 8)
+               if (prev_offset && reloc_offset(reloc) != prev_offset + 
elf_addr_size(file->elf))
                        break;

                /* Detect function pointers from contiguous objects: */
@@ -2011,7 +2011,12 @@ static int add_jump_table(struct objtool_file 
*file, struct instruction *insn,
                    reloc_addend(reloc) == pfunc->offset)
                        break;

-               dest_insn = find_insn(file, reloc->sym->sec, 
reloc_addend(reloc));
+               if (reloc_type(reloc) == R_ABS32 || reloc_type(reloc) == 
R_ABS64)
+                       offset = reloc_addend(reloc);
+               else
+                       offset = reloc_addend(reloc) + reloc_offset(table) - 
reloc_offset(reloc);
+
+               dest_insn = find_insn(file, reloc->sym->sec, offset);
                if (!dest_insn)
                        break;


Christophe

Reply via email to