Hi Kumar,
On Friday 18 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> >> On Jun 18, 2008, at 12:08 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>
> >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_CPM2) || defined(CONFIG_8xx_GPIO)
> >>> +
> >>> +struct cpm2_ioports {
> >>> + u32 dir, par, sor, odr, dat;
> >>> + u32 res[3];
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>
> >> is this really common for both CPM2 and 8xx? if so why the name?
> >
> > It is common to CPM2 and Port E of CPM1.
>
> but ports a-d are different on cpm1? I guess I'd like to see both
> patches to understand the commonality and differences.As Jorgen mentionned, both patches are still in patchwork: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19045 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=19386 Would it be possible for you to review them in time for 2.6.27 ? -- Laurent Pinchart CSE Semaphore Belgium Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A B-1410 Waterloo Belgium T +32 (2) 387 42 59 F +32 (2) 387 42 75
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
