> On 08-Sep-2023, at 7:48 PM, Athira Rajeev <atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 08-Sep-2023, at 11:04 AM, Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 07-Sep-2023, at 10:29 PM, Athira Rajeev <atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Testcase "Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs" parse events for
>>> all PMUs, and not just cpu. In case of powerpc, the PowerVM
>>> environment supports events from hv_24x7 and hv_gpci PMU which
>>> is of example format like below:
>>>
>>> - hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_INST,domain=?,core=?/
>>> - hv_gpci/event,partition_id=?/
>>>
>>> The value for "?" needs to be filled in depending on system
>>> configuration. It is better to skip these parametrized events
>>> in this test as it is done in:
>>> 'commit b50d691e50e6 ("perf test: Fix "all PMU test" to skip
>>> parametrized events")' which handled a simialr instance with
>>> "all PMU test".
>>>
>>> Fix parse-events test to skip parametrized events since
>>> it needs proper setup of the parameters.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> Addressed review comments from Ian. Updated size of
>>> pmu event name variable and changed bool name which is
>>> used to skip the test.
>>>
>>
>> The patch fixes the reported issue.
>>
>> 6.2: Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs : Ok
>> 6.3: Parsing of given PMU events from sysfs : Ok
>>
>> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sach...@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> - Sachin
>
> Hi Sachin, Ian
>
> Thanks for testing the patch
Hi Arnaldo
Can you please check and pull this if it looks good to go .
Thanks
Athira
>
> Athira
>
>
