> On 28-Sep-2023, at 9:24 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:29 PM Athira Rajeev
> <atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 25-Sep-2023, at 1:34 PM, kajoljain <kj...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/7/23 22:45, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> From: root <r...@ltcden13-lp4.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> shellcheck was run on perf tool shell scripts s a pre-requisite
>>>> to include a build option for shellcheck discussed here:
>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg25553.html
>>>>
>>>> And fixes were added for the coding/formatting issues in
>>>> two patchsets:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230613164145.50488-1-atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230709182800.53002-1-atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>>>>
>>>> Three additional issues are observed with shellcheck "0.6" and
>>>> this patchset covers those. With this patchset,
>>>>
>>>> # for F in $(find tests/shell/ -perm -o=x -name '*.sh'); do shellcheck -S
>>>> warning $F; done
>>>> # echo $?
>>>> 0
>>>>
>>>
>>> Patchset looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kj...@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kajol Jain
>>>
>>
>> Hi Namhyunbg,
>>
>> Can you please check for this patchset also
>
> Sure, it's applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!
Thanks Namhyung
Athira
