On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 08:06:04PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > ptep++; > - pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) + (1UL << PTE_RPN_SHIFT)); > addr += PAGE_SIZE; > + /* > + * increment the pfn. > + */ > + pte = pfn_pte(pte_pfn(pte) + 1, pte_pgprot((pte)));
when i looked at this, it generated shit code. did you check? why did you bother changing this?
