Dan Williams wrote: > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:35:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > tree/branch: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > > branch HEAD: c503e3eec382ac708ee7adf874add37b77c5d312 Add linux-next > > > specific files for 20231030 > > > > > > Error/Warning reports: > > > ... > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310302206.pkr5ebdi-...@intel.com > > > > > Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) > > > > > > Warning: MAINTAINERS references a file that doesn't exist: > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bma400.yaml > > > aarch64-linux-ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xbbc): undefined > > > reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > ... > > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmio.h:67:(.text+0xd66): undefined reference to > > > `pci_print_aer' > > > csky-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0x6e8): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921: undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xbc0): undefined reference to > > > `pci_print_aer' > > > ... > > > ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921: undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > loongarch64-linux-ld: drivers/cxl/core/pci.c:921:(.text+0xa38): undefined > > > reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > pci.c:(.text+0x662): undefined reference to `pci_print_aer' > > > powerpc-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0xf10): undefined reference to > > > `pci_print_aer' > > > riscv64-linux-ld: pci.c:(.text+0x11ec): undefined reference to > > > `pci_print_aer' > > > > I have no idea about the above (and all the similar ones below); I > > assume they all have to do with > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018171713.1883517-13-rrich...@amd.com > > Yes, I will get this fix folded into cxl/next: > > diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h > index f6ea2f57d808..3db310c19ab7 100644 > --- a/include/linux/aer.h > +++ b/include/linux/aer.h > @@ -43,16 +43,20 @@ struct aer_capability_regs { > #if defined(CONFIG_PCIEAER) > int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev); > int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev); > +void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, > + struct aer_capability_regs *aer); > #else > static inline int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > return -EINVAL; > } > static inline int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; } > +static inline void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, > + struct aer_capability_regs *aer) > +{ > +} > #endif > > -void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity, > - struct aer_capability_regs *aer); > int cper_severity_to_aer(int cper_severity); > void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn, > int severity, struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs);
Actually, no this was my fault for inadvertantly including this patch in the branch: http://lore.kernel.org/r/653c7eb29265c_244c8f29...@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch ...which had the desired effect, but at the cost of thrashing linux-next. Apologies for that.
