From: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com> Add an assertion that there are no in-progress MMU invalidations when a VM is being destroyed, with the exception of the scenario where KVM unregisters its MMU notifier between an .invalidate_range_start() call and the corresponding .invalidate_range_end().
KVM can't detect unpaired calls from the mmu_notifier due to the above exception waiver, but the assertion can detect KVM bugs, e.g. such as the bug that *almost* escaped initial guest_memfd development. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e397d30c-c6af-e68f-d18e-b4e3739c5...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sea...@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <ta...@google.com> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <ta...@google.com> Message-Id: <20231027182217.3615211-5-sea...@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 9cc57b23ec81..5422ce20dcba 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -1358,9 +1358,16 @@ static void kvm_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm) * No threads can be waiting in kvm_swap_active_memslots() as the * last reference on KVM has been dropped, but freeing * memslots would deadlock without this manual intervention. + * + * If the count isn't unbalanced, i.e. KVM did NOT unregister its MMU + * notifier between a start() and end(), then there shouldn't be any + * in-progress invalidations. */ WARN_ON(rcuwait_active(&kvm->mn_memslots_update_rcuwait)); - kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count = 0; + if (kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count) + kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count = 0; + else + WARN_ON(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress); #else kvm_flush_shadow_all(kvm); #endif -- 2.39.1
