Grant Likely wrote:
> static const struct of_device_id mpc_i2c_of_match[] = {
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", .data = fsl_i2c_mpc5200b_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", .data = fsl_i2c_mpc5200_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8260-i2c", .data = fsl_i2c_mpc8xxx_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8349-i2c", .data = fsl_i2c_mpc8xxx_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8540-i2c", .data = fsl_i2c_mpc8xxx_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c", .data =
> fsl_i2c_mpc8xxx_div2_set_freq, },
> {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c", .data =
> fsl_i2c_mpc8xxx_div3_set_freq, },
So we need to update this table every time there's a new SOC? All 83xx, 85xx,
and 86xx SOCs use the same table. I'd prefer an implementation that does need a
specific entry for each variant of 8[356]xx.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
