On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 9:15 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 26/02/2024 11.11, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > SPRs annotated with SPR_HARNESS can change between consecutive reads > > because the test harness code has changed them. Avoid failing the > > test in this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> > > --- > > powerpc/sprs.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c > > index 8253ea971..44edd0d7b 100644 > > --- a/powerpc/sprs.c > > +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c > > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > if (before[i] >> 32) > > pass = false; > > } > > - if (!(sprs[i].type & SPR_ASYNC) && (before[i] != after[i])) > > + if (!(sprs[i].type & (SPR_HARNESS|SPR_ASYNC)) && (before[i] != > > after[i])) > > pass = false; > > > > if (sprs[i].width == 32 && !(before[i] >> 32) && !(after[i] >> > > 32)) > > I guess you could also squash this into the previous patch (to avoid > problems with bisecting later?) ...
Yeah, I guess it doesn't make much sense to split out since lots of other stuff changes in the previous patch too. > > Anyway: > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> Thanks, Nick
