* Rohan McLure <rmcl...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Rohan McLure (11):
> Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in
> [__]page_table_check_pud_set"
> Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in
> [__]page_table_check_pmd_set"
> Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in
> [__]page_table_check_pud_clear"
> Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in
> [__]page_table_check_pmd_clear"
> Revert "mm/page_table_check: remove unused parameter in
> [__]page_table_check_pte_clear"
Just a process request: please give these commits proper titles, they
are not really 'reverts' in the classical sense, and this title hides
what is being done in the commit. The typical use of reverts is to
revert a bad change because it broke something. Here the goal is to
reintroduce functionality.
So please name these 5 patches accordingly, to shed light on what is
being reintroduced. You can mention it at the end of the changelog that
it's a functional revert of commit XYZ, but that's not the primary
purpose of the commit.
Thanks,
Ingo
