Fix a comment in function which explains how multi_regs field gets set for an instruction. In the example, "mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4)", the comment mistakenly referred to "dst_multi_regs = 0". Correct it to use "src_multi_regs = 0"
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atraj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c index f5b6b5e5e757..0f5e10654d09 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c @@ -2093,7 +2093,7 @@ static int extract_reg_offset(struct arch *arch, const char *str, * mov 0x18, %r8 # src_reg1 = -1, src_mem = 0 * # dst_reg1 = r8, dst_mem = 0 * - * mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4) # src_reg1 = rsi, src_mem = 0, dst_multi_regs = 0 + * mov %rsi, 8(%rbx,%rcx,4) # src_reg1 = rsi, src_mem = 0, src_multi_regs = 0 * # dst_reg1 = rbx, dst_reg2 = rcx, dst_mem = 1 * # dst_multi_regs = 1, dst_offset = 8 */ -- 2.43.0
