Roel,

> untested, is it correct?

Your patch is correct.

Thanks for your pointing it out and sending the patch. I tested your
patch and it works good.

Fortunately, this bug is not fatal because it seems that the SCC-UHC
sets SCC_UHC_USBEN and SCC_UHC_USBCEN at once.


Your patch does not contain 'Signed-off-by' line. Could you re-post it
with your sign?


> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc.h:224:
> #define SCC_UHC_USBEN           0x00010000
> #define SCC_UHC_USBCEN          0x00020000
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
> index d63b720..b086f33 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/celleb_scc_uhc.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
>  
>  static inline int uhc_clkctrl_ready(u32 val)
>  {
> -     const u32 mask = SCC_UHC_USBCEN | SCC_UHC_USBCEN;
> +     const u32 mask = SCC_UHC_USBCEN | SCC_UHC_USBEN;
>       return((val & mask) == mask);
>  }
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Best regards,
Kou Ishizaki
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to