> Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a > list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely > different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different. > > Or am I totally missing what you are saying?
Yeah, I wasn't clear -- I meant to add a new helper like of_flat_dt_is_compatible_list() (not sure of the name) that takes a node and a NULL-terminated array of strings, and then mpc5200_simple_probe() can become a one-liner, along with mpc5121_generic_probe(), tqm85xx_probe(), ppc44x_probe(), etc. - R. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
