Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The following workaround seems to fix the crashes on powerpc.
> However, this patch is clearly not what we want for other architectures,
> as they might need -fno-omit-frame-pointer to function properly.

This has a better chance to be accepted. :-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 8b5a7d3..f9a2e48 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ config LOCKDEP
        bool
        depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT 
&& LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
        select STACKTRACE
-       select FRAME_POINTER if !X86 && !MIPS
+       select FRAME_POINTER if !X86 && !MIPS && !PPC
        select KALLSYMS
        select KALLSYMS_ALL
 

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/Makefile    2008-08-24 11:50:23.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/Makefile 2008-08-24 12:15:54.000000000 +0200
> @@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += sched_cpupri.o
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER),y)
>  # According to Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, the -fno-omit-frame-pointer is
>  # needed for x86 only.  Why this used to be enabled for all architectures is 
> beyond
>  # me.  I suspect most platforms don't need this, but until we know that for 
> sure
>  # I turn this off for IA-64 only.  Andreas Schwab says it's also needed on 
> m68k
>  # to get a correct value for the wait-channel (WCHAN in ps). --davidm
> -CFLAGS_sched.o := $(PROFILING) -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> +CFLAGS_sched.o := $(PROFILING)

CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER is already enabled on powerpc.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to