Le 20/05/2025 à 04:32, Herbert Xu a écrit :
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 03:55:16PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
As far as I can see related patches found in linux-next tree were not sent
to linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org.
I just checked and it was definitely sent to linuxppc-dev:
Oops sorry, my mistake.
I see them in patchwork, they still have status 'New'.
Cc: oe-kbuild-...@lists.linux.dev, Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-cry...@vger.kernel.org>, Venkat Rao
Bagalkote <venka...@linux.ibm.com>, Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.ibm.com>, Stephen Rothwell
<s...@canb.auug.org.au>, Danny Tsen <dt...@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael
Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Could you resend them, and split out the introduction of
CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 from other parts of patch "crypto:
powerpc/poly1305 - Add SIMD fallback" and add the lib/tishift.S in the patch
which adds CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 ?
I'll just revert them and mark powerpc/poly1305 as broken. You
guys can sort it out later.
Fine, lets do that and make sure all necessary bits are there when
enabling CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
Thanks
Christophe
