On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:21:06 +0200
"Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.france...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> ghes_do_proc() has a catch-all for unknown or unhandled CPER formats
> (UEFI v2.10 Appendix N 2.3), extlog_print() does not. This gap was
> noticed by a RAS test that injected CXL protocol errors which were
> notified to extlog_print() via the IOMCA (I/O Machine Check
> Architecture) mechanism. Bring parity to the extlog_print() path by
> including a similar log_non_standard_event().
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.france...@linux.intel.com>
Makes sense to me.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/ras/ras.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> index f7fb7205028d..caca6ccd6e99 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> @@ -182,6 +182,12 @@ static int extlog_print(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long val,
> if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*mem))
> trace_extlog_mem_event(mem, err_seq, fru_id,
> fru_text,
>
> (u8)gdata->error_severity);
> + } else {
> + void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
> +
> + log_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text,
> + gdata->error_severity, err,
> + gdata->error_data_length);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> index a6e4792a1b2e..ac0e132ccc3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void log_non_standard_event(const guid_t *sec_type, const
> guid_t *fru_id,
> {
> trace_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text, sev, err, len);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(log_non_standard_event);
>
> void log_arm_hw_error(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err)
> {
