On Mon, 19 May 2025, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> From: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stola...@oracle.com>
> 
> Some existing logs in pci_print_aer() log with error severity by default.
> Convert them to depend on error type (consistent with rest of AER logging).
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250321015806.954866-3-pan...@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stola...@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 73b03a195b14..06a7dda20846 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -788,15 +788,21 @@ void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int 
> aer_severity,
>       layer = AER_GET_LAYER_ERROR(aer_severity, status);
>       agent = AER_GET_AGENT(aer_severity, status);
>  
> -     pci_err(dev, "aer_status: 0x%08x, aer_mask: 0x%08x\n", status, mask);
> +     aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_status: 0x%08x, aer_mask: 0x%08x\n",
> +                status, mask);
>       __aer_print_error(dev, &info);
> -     pci_err(dev, "aer_layer=%s, aer_agent=%s\n",
> -             aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
> +     aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_layer=%s, aer_agent=%s\n",
> +                aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
>  
>       if (aer_severity != AER_CORRECTABLE)
> -             pci_err(dev, "aer_uncor_severity: 0x%08x\n",
> -                     aer->uncor_severity);
> +             aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_uncor_severity: 0x%08x\n",
> +                        aer->uncor_severity);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * pcie_print_tlp_log() uses KERN_ERR, but we only call it when
> +      * tlp_header_valid is set, and info.level is always KERN_ERR in
> +      * that case.
> +      */
>       if (tlp_header_valid)
>               pcie_print_tlp_log(dev, &aer->header_log, dev_fmt("  "));

There's another similar callsite but only this has the comment added. I 
was thinking if this call could be made from __aer_print_error(). There 
would be small change in order of messages but I can't seem to decide if 
it would be bad/good.

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvi...@linux.intel.com>


>  }
> 

-- 
 i.

Reply via email to