On (25/06/30 14:59), David Hildenbrand wrote:
[..]
>  static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
> @@ -1736,6 +1736,13 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, 
> struct page *page,
>       unsigned long old_obj, new_obj;
>       unsigned int obj_idx;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * TODO: nothing prevents a zspage from getting destroyed while
> +      * isolated: we should disallow that and defer it.
> +      */

Can you elaborate?

Reply via email to