On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 7:48 AM Christian Zigotzky
<chzigot...@xenosoft.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 08 August 2025 um 01:23 pm, Mario Limonciello <supe...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >
> >> On 8/8/25 2:36 AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> >> On 07 August 2025 at 04:21 pm, Limonciello, Mario 
> >> <mario.limoncie...@amd.com> wrote:
> >> Does applying
> >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/907a7a2e5bf40c6a359b2f6cc53d6fdca04009e0
> >> help?
> >> - - -
> >> Hello Mario,
> >> Thanks a lot for your patch.
> >> I tested it today but unfortunately it doesn’t solve the issue with the 
> >> Radeon framebuffer.
> >> I have created two kernels with and without the drm-next-2025-07-30 
> >> updates [1] because of the issue with the Radeon graphics framebuffer 
> >> device #15. [2]
> >> Download and further information: 
> >> https://github.com/chzigotzky/kernels/releases/tag/v6.17.0-alpha5
> >> I have tested both kernels this week and I can definitely confirm, that 
> >> the issue is somewhere in the commit drm-next-2025-07-30 updates [1].
> >> The Radeon graphics framebuffer doesn't work with the kernel with the 
> >> drm-next-2025-07-30 updates [1]. Without these updates, the framebuffer 
> >> works.
> >> I bisected yesterday. [2]
> >> There are some other user reports:
> >> - https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=60606#p60606
> >> - https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=60595#p60595
> >> They use other Radeon graphics chips.
> >> @All
> >> Please check the drm-next-2025-07-30 updates [1]
> >> Thanks,
> >> Christian
> >> [1] 
> >> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=260f6f4fda93c8485c8037865c941b42b9cba5d2
> >> [2] https://github.com/chzigotzky/kernels/issues/15
> >
> > I think there is a mistake in your bisect, which I notice from looking at 
> > your other user reports.
> >
> > The original commit you identified in your bisect and thus CC'ed me came in 
> > 6.16-rc1.
> >
> > ❯ git describe --contains 4d4c10f763d7808fbade28d83d237411603bca05
> > v6.16-rc1~50^2~19^2
> >
> > There absolutely was a regression for that was raised, but this was fixed 
> > in 6.16-rc3.
> >
> > ❯ git describe --contains 907a7a2e5bf40c6a359b2f6cc53d6fdca04009e0
> > v6.16-rc3~13^2~1
> >
> > Users in your forums posts talk about 6.16 final working fine.  So I think 
> > that when you bisected you ran into multiple confounding issues and 
> > replicated in a similar fashion.  You should check every single bisect step 
> > to see if 4d4c10f763d7808fbade28d83d237411603bca05 is applied.  If it's 
> > applied but 907a7a2e5bf40c6a359b2f6cc53d6fdca04009e0 is not applied in that 
> > step you should apply 907a7a2e5bf40c6a359b2f6cc53d6fdca04009e0.
> >
> > Hopefully that will get you down to the real cause.
>
> Thanks for the hint. Unfortunately I don’t have more time for figuring out 
> the issue.

Does this patch help?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20250805175752.690504-4-imre.d...@intel.com/

Alex

>
> Two facts:
>
> - The Radeon driver can no longer be used.
> The Radeon driver is broken for us.
>
> - The issue is somewhere in the commit drm-next-2025-07-30 updates [1].
>
> I cannot provide any more due to time constraints.
>
> I've already spent time that I didn't actually have.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Christian
>
>

Reply via email to