Fix spelling mistakes:
tmp_trap.c:94 te -> the
tmp_trap.c:96 tread -> treated
reported by: codespell
Signed-off-by: Moktar SELLAMI <smokthar...@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c
index 97cb74768e30..298bd09c55bb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-trap.c
@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ void trap_signal_handler(int signo, siginfo_t *si, void *uc)
* LE endianness does in effect nothing, instruction (2)
* is then executed again as 'trap', generating a second
* trap event (note that in that case 'trap' is caught
- * not in transacional mode). On te other hand, if after
+ * not in transacional mode). On the other hand, if
after
* the return from the signal handler the endianness in-
- * advertently flipped, instruction (1) is tread as a
+ * advertently flipped, instruction (1) is treated as a
* branch instruction, i.e. b .+8, hence instruction (3)
* and (4) are executed (tbegin.; trap;) and we get sim-
* ilaly on the trap signal handler, but now in TM mode.
--
2.34.1
