在 2025/8/29 13:59, Viresh Kumar 写道:
On 27-08-25, 10:31, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn>
---
drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
Thanks for applying the patch!
I’ve been thinking further — instead of using __free directly, maybe we
could introduce a small macro wrapper around it to make the release
scope more controllable and consistent.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/6174bcc8-30f5-479b-bac6-f42eb1232...@kylinos.cn/
Do you think this would be a better approach, or should we just stick
with the current use of __free?
