On 2025-10-17 08:43, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: [... remembering to trim ...]
long strnlen_user_nofault(const void __user *unsafe_addr, long count); -#ifndef __get_kernel_nofault +#ifdef arch_get_kernel_nofault
One more thing: This is removing the leading __ from __get_kernel_nofault, which AFAIR has a defined semantic about needing explicit checks. Is that on purpose ? IOW, would you rather have __arch_get_kernel_nofault ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
