* Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> > that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new
> > marker_synchronize_unregister() facility.
>
> d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge?
would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits,
then we can merge it. It's a oneliner so it shouldnt cause merging
trouble in linux-next.
Ingo
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
