On 04/11/2025 12:28, Ally Heev wrote:
> Uninitialized pointers with `__free` attribute can cause undefined
> behaviour as the memory allocated to the pointer is freed automatically
> when the pointer goes out of scope
> 
> powerpc/km82xx doesn't have any bugs related to this as of now, but,
> it is better to initialize and assign pointers with `__free` attribute
> in one statement to ensure proper scope-based cleanup
> 
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> Signed-off-by: Ally Heev <[email protected]>
> ---
> Testing:
> Successfully compiled the kernel with `allmodconfig`
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/km82xx.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/km82xx.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/km82xx.c
> index 
> 99f0f0f4187672614f4f8ad46ab7906f7ad8078b..4ad223525e893c0de15540db2b2c4d239d6d841e
>  100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/km82xx.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/82xx/km82xx.c
> @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
>  
>  static void __init km82xx_pic_init(void)
>  {
> -     struct device_node *np __free(device_node);
> -     np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,pq2-pic");
> +     struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = 
> of_find_compatible_node(NULL,
> +             NULL, "fsl,pq2-pic");
>  


Original patch was correct:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

It is the maintainer who decided to break it while applying, not
following clear cleanup.h recommendations and not giving a chance to
object to people. :/

So now we have a fixing commit.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to