On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:04:15PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 08:21:34AM -0500, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Ugh, messy. But yes, this does look better, thanks for that. Want me > > to take it through the USB tree, or will you take it through one of > > yours? (I don't remember what started this thread...) > > See #work.functionfs in my tree - that patch carved up + fix for UAF > on uncancelled scheduled work. Individual patches in followups. > If you have problems with that series, please say so. Otherwise > I'm merging it with #work.persistence (with #36 in there updated as > posted)...
All looks good to me, thanks! If it matters: Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
