On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 06:14:32PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > Detailed problem statement and some of the implementation choices were > discussed earlier[1]. > > [1]: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > This is likely the version which would be used for LPC2025 discussion on > this topic. Feel free to provide your suggestion and hoping for a solution > that works for different architectures and it's use cases. > > All the existing alternatives such as cpu hotplug, creating isolated > partitions etc break the user affinity. Since number of CPUs to use change > depending on the steal time, it is not driven by User. Hence it would be > wrong to break the affinity. This series allows if the task is pinned > only paravirt CPUs, it will continue running there. > > Changes compared v3[1]:
There is no "v" for this series :(
